4.4 Article

Association of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (the Rancho Bernardo study)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 99-102

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.070

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-07181] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-31801] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK031801] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG007181, R37AG007181] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as predictors of atherosclerosis have had mixed results. The purpose of this study was to assess the associations of IL-6 and CRP with the severity of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis measured 12 years later. Participants were 392 adults (56.9% women, mean age 63.2 years) from the Rancho Bernardo Study who had biomarkers measured from 1984 to 1987 and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measured from 1996 to 1998. Age-adjusted mean carotid IMT was significantly greater in men than women. After adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, carotid IMT increased significantly with increasing IL-6 quartiles (p < 0.001). In similar analyses, the association between CRP quartiles and carotid IMT was weaker but remained statistically significant (p < 0.05). In multiple regression analysis, IL-6 was significantly associated with carotid IMT regardless of CRP. Conversely, CRP was significantly associated with carotid IMT when IL-6 was not included in the model, but this association became nonsignificant when IL-6 was included. In conclusion, baseline IL-6 and CRP were significantly associated with carotid atherosclerosis independent of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. The association of IL-6 was independent of CRP, but not vice versa, suggesting an effect of IL-6 on an earlier state of atherosclerosis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据