4.7 Article

Copy number alterations of c-MYC and PTEN are prognostic factors for relapse after prostate cancer radiotherapy

期刊

CANCER
卷 118, 期 16, 页码 4053-4062

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26729

关键词

prostate cancer; c-MYC; radiotherapy; genetic instability; comparative genomic hybridization; Gleason score; prostate-specific antigen; T category

类别

资金

  1. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the use of PSA, Gleason score, and T-category as prognosticators in intermediate-risk prostate cancer, 2040% of patients will fail local therapy. In order to optimize treatment approaches for intermediate-risk patients, additional genetic prognosticators are needed. Previous reports using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in radical prostatectomy cohorts suggested a combination of allelic loss of the PTEN gene on 10q and allelic gain of the c-MYC gene on 8q were associated with metastatic disease. We tested whether copy number alterations (CNAs) in PTEN (allelic loss) and c-MYC (allelic gain) were associated with biochemical relapse following modern-era, image-guided radiotherapy (mean dose 76.4 Gy). We used aCGH analyses validated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) of DNA was derived from frozen, pre-treatment biopsies in 126 intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Patients whose tumors had CNAs in both PTEN and c-MYC had significantly increased genetic instability (percent genome alteration; PGA) compared to tumors with normal PTEN and c-MYC status (p < 0.0001). We demonstrate that c-MYC gain alone, or combined c-MYC gain and PTEN loss, were increasingly prognostic for relapse on multivariable analyses (hazard ratios (HR) of 2.58/p = 0.005 and 3.21/p = 0.0004; respectively). Triaging patients by the use of CNAs within pre-treatment biopsies may allow for better use of systemic therapies to target sub-clinical metastases or locally recurrent disease and improve clinical outcomes. Cancer 2012. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据