4.7 Article

The effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on the morphology of uterine tissues after 3 months treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1696-1704

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem026

关键词

asoprisnil; cell-proliferation; endometrium; histopathology; progesterone receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Asoprisnil is a selective progesterone receptor modulator with mixed progesterone agonist/antagonist activity which controls uterine bleeding via an endometrial effect. This study examined full-thickness endometrial, leiomyoma and myometrial morphology in hysterectomy specimens from patients with uterine leiomyomata, after treatment with asoprisnil for 3 months. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 33 subjects with uterine leiomyomata were randomized to receive asoprisnil 10, 25 mg or placebo for an average of 95 days prior to hysterectomy. Samples of endometrium, myometrium anti leiomyoma tissue were subjected to systematic morphological assessment with quantification of mitotic activity. RESULTS: In patients treated with 10 or 25 mg asoprisnil, a unique pattern called 'non-physiologic secretory effect' was evident in endometrium, recognizable through partially developed secretory glandular appearances and stromal changes. Endometrial thickness was decreased, and there were low levels of mitotic activity in endometrial glands and stroma. Unusual thick-walled muscular arterioles and prominent aggregations of thin-walled vessels were present in endometrial stroma, but not in myometrium or non-endometrial vascular beds. Mitotic activity was decreased in leiomyomata. CONCLUSIONS: Asoprisnil induces unique morphological changes and is associated with low levels of glandular and stromal proliferation in endometrium, and in leiomyomata. These changes are likely to contribute to the amenorrhoea experienced after exposure to the medication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据