4.7 Article

Validation of the royal marsden hospital prognostic score in patients treated in the phase I clinical trials program at the MD Anderson Cancer Center

期刊

CANCER
卷 118, 期 5, 页码 1422-1428

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26413

关键词

phase 1 trials; prognosis score; lung cancer; pancreatic cancer; head and neck cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The authors validated the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in patients with advanced lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers who were enrolled on phase 1 trials in the MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Clinical Trials Program. METHODS: The RMH score uses albumin (>= 3.5 g/dL vs <3.5 g/dL), lactate dehydrogenase (less than or equal to the upper limit of normal [<= ULN] vs >ULN), and the number of metastatic sites (<= 2 sites vs >= 3 sites) to predict patient survival in phase 1 trials. The authors of this report retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 229 consecutive patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on 57 phase 1 trials. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients with lung cancer (N = 85), pancreatic cancer (N 83), and head and neck tumors (N 61) were treated. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 26-85 years), and 63% of the patients were men. Patients with a good RMH prognostic score (0-1) at baseline had a longer median survival than patients with a poor prognostic score (2-3; 33.9 weeks vs 21.1 weeks; P < .0001). The RMH score was an independent variable that predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Other independent variables that predicted better survival were hemoglobin level (>= 10.5 g/dL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1), and tumor type. Patients who were treated on first-in-human trials did not fare worse compared with those who were not treated on first-in-human trials. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on phase 1 trials, survival was predicted accurately by the RMH prognostic score. Cancer 2012;118:1422-8. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据