4.7 Article

The Prognostic and Staging Implications of Bone Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 117, 期 19, 页码 4460-4467

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26032

关键词

head and neck neoplasms; oral; squamous cell carcinoma; bone invasion; survival; prognosis; staging

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to determine whether bone invasion is an independent prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after taking into account the extent of bone invasion. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of 498 patients with oral SCC undergoing surgery with curative intent, 102 of whom had pathologically proven bone invasion. Bone invasion was categorized as absent, cortical, or medullary and tested for association with disease control and survival. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounding factors in multivariate analysis, there was no association between cortical invasion and overall (P = .48) or disease-specific survival (P = .63). In contrast, medullary invasion was an independent predictor of reduced overall (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.1; P = .006) and disease-specific survival (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6; P = .01), and this appeared to result from an increased risk of distant metastatic failure (P = .037) rather than local (P = .51) or regional recurrence (P = .14). Within the subset of patients with medullary invasion, survival differed significantly according to tumor size (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with oral SCC and bone invasion have widely variable outcomes depending on the depth of bone invasion and tumor size. The results suggest that the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, which classifies all tumors invading through cortical bone as T4, has limited prognostic utility. The authors recommend a revision of the T staging system such that tumors are classified as T1 to T3 based on size and then upstaged by 1 T stage in the presence of medullary bone invasion. Cancer 2011; 117: 4460-7. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据