4.7 Article

NCAM1 and neurocognition in schizophrenia

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 61, 期 7, 页码 902-910

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.036

关键词

CD56; genetic association study; NCAM; NCAM1; neurocognition; schizophrenia

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH074027, N01 MH90001] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [N01MH090001, R01MH074027] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alterations in neurocognition may be fundamental to schizophrenia and may be endophenotypes. Neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1, aliases NCAM and CD56) may be a candidate gene for schizophrenia or for neurocognition in schizophrenia as supported by linkage and functional findings. Methods: Subjects were 641 patients with schizophrenia who participated in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) clinical trial. Neurocognition was assessed at study baseline. Nine NCAM1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were blindly genotyped. Analysis of covariance was used to test for single SNP associations and haplotype regression for multilocus associations. Results: As there were suggestions of population stratification, all analyses were conducted stratified by inferred ancestry. In the Europe only stratum, there were nominally significant associations with five contiguous SNPs (rs1943620, rs1836796, rs1821693, rs686050, rs584427) with the strongest association at rs1836796 (p = .007). Via permutation testing, the probability of obtaining five consecutive statistically significant SNPs with p-values <= 5.05 was p = .0044. These results were robust to examination of model assumptions. Haplotype analyses did not identify significant haplotype associations. Conclusions: Although it is essential to see if these findings replicate in additional samples, we suggest that NCAM1 deserves further scrutiny for its relevance to clinical and etiological aspects of schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据