4.7 Article

Distinctive Chromosomal Instability Patterns in Oral Verrucous and Squamous Cell Carcinomas Detected by High-Resolution DNA Flow Cytometry

期刊

CANCER
卷 117, 期 22, 页码 5052-5057

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26126

关键词

oral verrucous carcinoma; oral squamous cell carcinoma; chromosomal instability; DNA aneuploidy; flow cytometry

类别

资金

  1. Philip Morris International
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo Programma Oncologia
  3. Universita di Torino, Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata Regione Piemonte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Oral verrucous carcinomas (OVCs) are characterized by better prognosis than oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs). Because chromosomal instability (CIN) in solid tumors is indicative of prognosis, this study investigated whether OVCs and OSCCs were characterized by differences in CIN biomarkers. METHODS: Fresh or frozen multiple tissue samples were submitted to high-resolution DNA flow cytometry (hr DNA-FCM). RESULTS: DNA aneuploid sublines were detected in 6 of 9 OVCs (66.7%) and in 20 of 25 OSCCs (80.0%). Multiple DNA aneuploid sublines were observed, respectively, in 2 of 6 (33.3%) DNA aneuploid OVCs and in 14 of 20 (70%) DNA aneuploid OSCCs (P = .163). OVCs were mainly characterized by DNA Index (DI) values in the near-diploid region (DI not equal 1 and DI < 1.4), whereas aneuploid OSCCs carried most frequently multiple aneuploid sublines with high DI values (DI >= 1.4). DNA near-diploid and high aneuploid sublines were, respectively, 87.5% and 12.5% for the OVCs versus 30% and 70% for the OSCCs (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Present data suggest that OVCs are characterized by a lower degree of CIN and tumor heterogeneity than OSCCs, such that they appear as frozen in an early stage of DNA near-diploid aneuploidy, as previously observed for oral preneoplastic lesions. These DI characteristics, which can easily be obtained by hr DNA-FCM, appear to reflect the well-known differences in aggressiveness and prognosis of OVCs and OSCCs. Cancer 2011;117:5052-7. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据