4.7 Article

Extended field stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 118, 期 17, 页码 4193-4200

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27372

关键词

glioblastoma; glioma; gamma knife; stereotactic radiosurgery; radiation therapy; recurrence

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591864, 24592145, 21390404, 21591881, 23791586] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is among the few therapeutic options for glioblastoma that recurs after standard radiation and chemotherapy, but its efficacy has been limited. METHODS: Since November 2007, the authors have modified the clinical target volume by adding a 0.5- to 1-cm margin to the gadolinium-enhanced area (extended field SRS), in contrast to conventional SRS using no margin to set the clinical target volume. A total of 35 recurred glioblastoma lesions in 9 patients were treated with conventional SRS between December 1990 and January 2007, and 14 lesions in 9 patients were treated with extended field SRS. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods were 7 months (range, 3-29 months) and 8 months (range, 6-27 months), respectively. The local control rate was 47% for conventional SRS and 93% for extended field SRS (P = .0035), and the numbers of radiation necrosis observed in SRS-treated lesions were 2 and 4, respectively. The median overall survival from the diagnosis was 24 months (range, 14-57 months) for conventional SRS and 21 months (range, 15-51 months) for extended field SRS (statistically not significant). Seven patients treated with conventional SRS died during follow-up, 6 from progression of the SRS-treated tumor, whereas 7 patients treated with extended field SRS died during follow-up, 6 from remote intracerebral dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Extended field SRS was superior to conventional SRS in the local control of small recurrent lesions of glioblastoma, although a further device to suppress remote dissemination may be necessary to increase survival. Cancer 2012. (c) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据