4.7 Article

Impact of race on survival in patients with clinically nonmetastatic prostate cancer who deferred primary treatment

期刊

CANCER
卷 118, 期 12, 页码 3145-3152

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26619

关键词

prostate cancer; race; survival; surveillance; nonmetastatic

类别

资金

  1. Department of Defense [PC080010]
  2. Clinical and Reduce Translational Science Institute of New York University [1UL1RR029893]
  3. National Institutes of Health Center [1U01CA149556-01]
  4. New York State Department of Health
  5. New York University School of Medicine Center of Excellence of Urologic Disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) racial disparity studies typically focus on survival differences after curative treatment. The authors of this report hypothesized that comparing mortality rates between African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) patients who deferred primary treatment for clinically nonmetastatic PCa may provide a better assessment of the impact of race on the natural course of PCa. METHODS: The pathology database of the New York Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), an equal access-of-care facility, was searched for patients with biopsy-proven PCa. Inclusion criteria included 1) no evidence of metastatic disease or death within 3 years after diagnosis, 2) no primary treatment, and 3) a minimum of 5 years of follow-up for survivors. RESULTS: In total, 518 patients met inclusion criteria between 1990 and 2005. AA patients were younger (P = .02) and had higher median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P = .001) at the time of diagnosis compared with CA patients. In a multivariate model, higher Gleason score and PSA level were associated with increased mortality (P = .001 and P = .03, respectively), but race was not a predictor of death from PCa. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggested that race did not have a major impact on survival in patients with PCa who deferred primary treatment for clinically nonmetastatic disease. Cancer 2012;118: 314552. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据