4.7 Article

Overall Survival and PD-L1 Expression in Metastasized Malignant Melanoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 117, 期 10, 页码 2192-2201

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25747

关键词

PD-1; PD-L1; B7-H1; melanoma

类别

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI2008c3988]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Cancers are known to elude the immune system, for example, by MHC loss, FAS up-regulation, or increased secretion of TGF-beta. Recently, ligands of coinhibitory receptors like programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1, B7-H1) have come to attention for their role in tumor immune escape. Various tumors have been tested for PD-L1 expression, and conflicting results were obtained regarding its correlative impact on patient survival. This study aimed to determine the prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression for the survival of melanoma patients. METHODS: Paraffin- embedded nevi, primary melanoma, and in-transit, lymph node, and distant organ metastases from a set of 63 stages III-IV melanoma patients referred to the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2000 and 2004 for a sentinelnode procedure or systemic therapy were studied. A large effort was invested in validating specific PD-L1 staining. In addition to immunological factors such as T-cell infiltration (CD8, CD4, and regulatory T cells), TGF-beta and MHC-I expression were assessed. RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis revealed no relevant PD-L1 expression on primary melanoma compared with metastatic disease. No significant correlations with prognosis were found regarding immunological factors, whereas known prognostic markers such as Breslow thickness and sex could be confirmed. Analyses of the overall survival of our patient cohort did not reveal a negative association with PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of overall survival with PD-L1 expression by melanoma cells remains controversial, and future clinical studies should focus on antibody validation and time of analysis in respect to disease progression. Cancer 2011; 117: 2192-201. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据