4.8 Article

Fibrogenic cell fate during fibrotic tissue remodelling observed in rat and human cultured liver slices

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 142-150

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.08.013

关键词

liver fibrosis; myofibroblast; apoptosis; alpha-smooth muscle actin; platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta; tissue remodelling; fibrosis reversibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Fibrotic liver remodelling was studied in culture of precision-cut liver slices (PCLS) derived from fibrotic liver. Methods: Fibrosis was induced in rats by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) treatment or bile duct ligation. Human fibrotic livers were also used. PCLS were cultured for 6, 24, 48, or 72 h, and the expression of a-smooth muscle (SM) actin, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor-beta, and active caspase 3 was studied by immunohistochemistry. Results: Before culture, in CCl4-treated or bile duct ligated animals, fibrosis was observed around centrolobular veins, or in portal zones, respectively. In PCLS derived from CO4-treated animals, alpha-SM actin expression disappeared after 24 h in culture while PDGF receptor-beta expression decreased progressively after 48 h. These changes were observed in absence of massive apoptosis. In PCLS derived from bile duct ligated animals, both alpha-SM actin and PDGF receptor-beta expression decreased after 48 h in culture with a massive apoptosis. In PCLS derived from human fibrotic livers, alpha-SM actin expression was dramatically reduced after 48 h in culture. Conclusions: After CCl4 treatment, a proportion of myofibroblasts derived from hepatic stellate cells seems to dedifferentiate while in bile duct ligation model, myofibroblasts derived from portal fibroblasts disappear by apoptosis, underlining the relevance of this model to evaluate the mechanisms involved in fibrotic liver remodelling. (c) 2006 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据