4.2 Article

Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Chagas antibody in US blood donors

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 90-96

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01068.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HB-47174] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, represents a serious blood safety problem due to increasing immigration from Latin America. The Food and Drug Administration recently recommended implementation of Chagas antibody screening for US donors as soon as a suitable assay is licensed. An anonymized preclinical study of a prototype T. cruzi lysate-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics was conducted. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two populations of specimens were evaluated: 1) 10,192 sequential donations from blood donors residing in the El Paso, Texas, area and 2) 178 specimens from South America which were presumptively positive for antibodies to T. cruzi and purchased from commercial vendors. RESULTS: A total of 10,189 (99.97%) of the 10,192 screened donor specimens did not react, whereas 3 (0.03%) tested initially reactive. The 3 initially reactive specimens tested repeat reactive and were confirmed by radioimmunoprecipitation analysis (RIPA). Based on antibody profile analysis, 2 of the 3 Chagas-positive specimens were from the same donor. Observed specificity of the test was therefore 100 percent. Of the specimens from South America, 173 of 178 were reactive by the prototype ELISA. Of the 5 nonreactive specimens, all did not react by indirect fluorescence assay, but 4 were positive by RIPA. Therefore, calculated sensitivity of the ELISA was 97.7 percent (173/177). CONCLUSIONS: These studies indicate that the prototype ELISA has excellent sensitivity and specificity for detection of antibodies to T. cruzi in donors. Moreover, among donations from a geographically selected collection region of the United States, observed seroprevalence was 0.03 percent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据