4.8 Article

The C-terminal domain of yeast PCNA is required for physical and functional interactions with Cdc9 DNA ligase

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 1624-1637

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA092584, R01 CA081967, P01 CA92584, CA081967] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM57479, R01 GM057479, R01 GM050006] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA081967, P01CA092584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM057479] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is compelling evidence that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a DNA sliding clamp, co-ordinates the processing and joining of Okazaki fragments during eukaryotic DNA replication. However, a detailed mechanistic understanding of functional PCNA:ligase I interactions has been incomplete. Here we present the co-crystal structure of yeast PCNA with a peptide encompassing the conserved PCNA interaction motif of Cdc9, yeast DNA ligase 1. The Cdc9 peptide contacts both the inter-domain connector loop (IDCL) and residues near the C-terminus of PCNA. Complementary mutational and biochemical results demonstrate that these two interaction interfaces are required for complex formation both in the absence of DNA and when PCNA is topologically linked to DNA. Similar to the functionally homologous human proteins, yeast RFC interacts with and inhibits Cdc9 DNA ligase whereas the addition of PCNA alleviates inhibition by RFC. Here we show that the ability of PCNA to overcome RFC-mediated inhibition of Cdc9 is dependent upon both the IDCL and the C-terminal interaction interfaces of PCNA. Together these results demonstrate the functional significance of the P-zipper structure formed between the C-terminal domain of PCNA and Cdc9 and reveal differences in the interactions of FEN-1 and Cdc9 with the two PCNA interfaces that may contribute to the co-ordinated, sequential action of these enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据