4.7 Article

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

期刊

CANCER
卷 115, 期 4, 页码 741-751

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24065

关键词

pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; pancreatic resection; survival advantage; Surveillance; Epidemiology; End Results (SEER) database

类别

资金

  1. PanCAN-Samuel Sttoum ASCO Young Investigator Award
  2. Howard Hughes Early Career Award
  3. Pancreatic Cancer Alliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Although surgical resection is generally recommended for patients with localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), the impact of resection on overall survival is unknown. The authors investigated the survival advantage of pancreatic resection using a national database. METHODS: This is a retrospective survival analysis of patients with PNETs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988-2002). RESULTS: A total of 728 patients with PNETs were identified with a median survival of 43 months using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Resection of tumor was associated with significantly improved survival compared with those patients who were recommended for but did not undergo resection (114 months vs 35 months; P < .0001). This survival benefit was demonstrated for patients with localized, regional, and metastatic disease. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to assess the overall effect of surgical resection on survival, and demonstrated an adjusted odds ratio of 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.66) compared with those who were recommended for surgery but did not proceed to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated in a large national study that resection of primary tumor in patients with PNETs is associated with improved survival across all disease stages. Patients with localized, regional, and metastatic PNETs who are reasonable operative candidates should be considered for resection of their primary tumors. Cancer 2009;115:741-51. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据