4.6 Article

Endothelial function across an oral contraceptive cycle in women using levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00762.2006

关键词

progestin; estrogen; hormonal contraception; flow-mediated dilation; birth control pills

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral contraceptive pills (CCPs) are a Popular contraception method. Currently, lower-dose ethinyl estradiol formulations are most commonly prescribed, although they have been linked to increased arterial vascular risk. The aim of till's Study was to investigate endothelial function in healthy young women using lower-dose ethinyl estradiol OCPs. We examined flow-mediated, endothelium-dependent and nitroglycerin-mediated, endothelium-independent vasodilation of the brachial artery, comparing two doses of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel OCPs in 15 healthy young women Oil two Study days: once during the active phase and once during the placebo phase of an OCP cycle. Group low dose (LD) (n = 7) active pills contained 150 mu g levonorgestrel/30 mu g ethinyl estradiol versus Group very low dose (VLD) (n = 8) with 100 mu g levonorgestrel/20 mu g ethinyl estradiol. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was lower during the active phase in Group VLD (5.33 +/- 1.77% vs. 7.23 +/- 2.60%; P = 0.024). This phase difference was not observed in Group LD (8.00 +/- 0.970% vs. 7.61 +/- 1.07%; P = 0.647). Endothelium-independent vasodilation did not differ between phases in either group. Finally, we measured endothelium-dependent vasodilation in two additional women who received 10 mu g of unopposed ethinyl estradiol. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was increased by unopposed ethinyl estradiol compared with the placebo phase (10.88 +/- 2.34% vs. 6.97 +/- 1.83%). These results suggest that levonorgestrel may antagonize the activity of ethinyl estradiol. Thus both the progestin type and estradiol dose need to be considered when assessing arterial vascular risk of OCP use in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据