4.6 Article

Osmium-mediated C-H and C-C bond cleavage of a phenolic substrate: p-quinone methide and methylene arenium pincer complexes

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 1382-1393

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200601385

关键词

C-C activation; C-H activation; osmium; P ligands; quinone methides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diphosphine 2,4,6(CH3),-315-(iPr(2)PCH(2))(2)C6OH (1) reacts with [OsCl2(PPh3)(3)] in presence of an excess of triethylamine to yield the isomeric para-quinone methide derivatives [Os{4-(CH2)-1-(O)-2,6-(CH3)(2)-3,5-(iPr(2)PCH(2))(2)C-6}(Cl)(H)(PPh3)] (2 and 3), which differ in the positions of the mutually trans hydride and chloride ligands. Complex 2 reacts with CO to afford the dicarbonyl species [Os{1-(O)-2,4,6-(CH3)(3)-3,5(iPr(2)PCH(2))(2)C-6](Cl)(CO)(2)] (4), which results from hydride insertion into the quinonic double bond. Protonation of 2 and 3 leads to the formation of the methylene arenium derivative [Os{(4)-(CH4)-1-(OH)-2,6-(CH3)(2)-3,5(iPr(2)PCH(2))(2)C-6}(Cl)(H)(PPh3)]- [OSO2CF3] (5a). The diphosphine I reacts with [OSCl2(PPh3)(3)] at 100 degrees C under H-2 to afford [Os{1-(OH)-2,6-(CH3)2-3,5-(iPr(2)pCH(2))(2)C-6}(Cl)(H-2)- (PPh3)] (6), a PCP pincer complex resulting formally from C(sp(2))-C(sp(3)) cleavage of the C-CH3 group in 1. CC hydrogenolysis resulting in the same complex is achieved by heating 2 under H-2 pressure. Reaction of the diphosphine substrate with [OsCl2(PPh3)(3)] under H-2 at lower temperature allows the observation of a methylene aremum derivative resulting from C-H activation, [Os{4-(CH2)-1-(OH)-2,6(CH3)(2)-3,5-(iPr(2)pCH(2))(2)C-6}(Cl)(2)(H)] (7). This compound reacts with PPh3 in toluene to afford the ionic derivative [Os[4-(CH2)-l-(OH)-2,6-(CH3)(2)-3,5-(iPr(2)PCH(2))(2)C-6}(Cl)(H)(PPh3)]Cl (5b). X-ray diffraction studies have been carried out on compounds 2, 3, 4, 5b, 6, and 7, which allows the study of the structural variations when going from methylene arenium to quinone methide derivatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据