4.7 Article

Weekly treatment with bortezomib for patients with recurrent or refractory multiple myeloma - A phase 2 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

期刊

CANCER
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 765-771

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23606

关键词

bortezomib; multiple myeloma; proteasome inhibitors; response rate

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly bortezomib in the treatment of patients with recurrent/refractory Multiple myeloma. METHODS. A total of 40 patients with multiple myeloma who had received either 1 or 2 previous treatment regimens were treated with bortezomib at a dose of 1.6 mg/m(2) intravenously for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week without treatment. Responses were measured using International Myeloma Working Group criteria. RESULTS. Twenty-two patients (55%; 95% confidence interval, 40%-70%) achieved objective responses to treatment, with a median response duration of 16 months. The median progression-free survival for all patients was 9.6 months, with a 1-year progression-free survival rate of 39%. The 1-year and 2-year overall Survival rates were 75% and 51%, respectively. Weekly bortezomib was generally well tolerated; grade 3/4 (using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) neutropenia (13%), thrombocytopenia (20%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (13%), and neuropathy (10%) were experienced by a minority of patients. CONCLUSIONS. In the current study, a schedule of weekly bortezomib was found to be effective and well tolerated in patients with previously treated Multiple myeloma. Although the response rate and duration appear comparable to those achieved with twice-weekly bortezomib, the relative efficacy of these 2 schedules cannot he determined definitively on the basis of this phase 2 study. A weekly schedule of bortezomib is a reasonable option for patients who have logistic difficulties receiving a twice-weekly schedule, and is an attractive schedule for incorporation into combination regimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据