4.7 Article

Completion of premaintenance phases in total therapies 2 and 3 improves clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma - An important variable to be considered in clinical trial designs

期刊

CANCER
卷 112, 期 12, 页码 2720-2725

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23487

关键词

total therapy; overall survival; event-free survival; completion of therapy

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA055819] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Total Therapy (TT) programs are complex and their execution over the course of several years is fraught with patient attrition due to failure and toxicity of therapy and patient/physician acceptance. METHODS. The impact of completion versus noncompletion of intended treatment steps was examined in protocols TT2 (n = 668) and TT3 (n = 303) on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS. By using appropriate landmarks of 36 months with TT2 and 18 months with TT3, representing the maxima to completion of premaintenance phases, postconsolidation OS was superior for 211 patients completing versus 311 patients not completing premaintenance steps on TT2 (P = .001), which also pertained to the 161 patients completing versus 47 not completing intended treatment steps on TT3 (P = .01). On multivariate analysis that included all patients, completion of therapy independently favored longer OS and EFS in the context of both standard prognostic factors and gene expression profiling-defined risk; in addition, TT3 prolonged EFS over results obtained with TT2. CONCLUSIONS. 1) Completion of intended therapy was a significant independent variable conferring superior OS and EFS in TT programs; and 2) after adjusting for completion of therapy, EFS was still superior with TT3 versus TT2, supporting the beneficial role of bortezomib included in TT3. Collectively, these data point to the importance of designing clinical trials that balance the treatment requirements for disease control with host acceptance and tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据