4.7 Article

Characterization of in vitro biofilm-associated pneumococcal phase variants of a clinically relevant serotype 3 clone

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 97-101

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01658-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [K23AI001788] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K23 AI01788, K23 AI001788] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An increasing proportion of children with acute otitis media due to Streptococcus pneumoniae have serotype 3 infections since licensure of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. These serotype 3 strains are genetically related by molecular subtyping. During otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media, biofilms commonly develop. Pneumococcal in vitro biofilms are comprised of phase variants that differ in colony morphology. By using a representative strain of the mucoid serotype 3 clone, rough phase variants with a diverse array of mutations were detected in biofilms formed in vitro. Most phase variants had mutations in the cps3D gene, the first gene of the capsular operon. Eleven had single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the cps3D gene, one had an SNP in the -10 promoter, and three had large deletions in the cps3D gene. Reversion to the mucoid phenotype was associated with reversion of the mutation in the cps3D gene. Unlike the phase variants detected in the nasopharynx, which have at least 20% of the parental amount of capsule, the in vitro biofilm-associated phase variants had :512% of the parental amount of capsule, as determined by capsule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we determined that capsule expression in the phase variants was likely regulated at multiple levels. These in vitro phase variation data, which underscore the plasticity of the pneumococcus, need to be confirmed with in vivo analyses of the middle ear mucosa during otitis media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据