4.7 Review

Inherited pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes: Advances in molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and controversies

期刊

CANCER
卷 113, 期 7, 页码 1807-1843

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23648

关键词

pancreatic endocrine tumors; neuroendocrine tumors; Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1; von Hippel-Lindau disease; neurofibromatosis 1; tuberous sclerosis; gastrinomas; insulinomas; Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. [R01 CA 096645-01]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA096645] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [ZIADK053200, Z01DK053215] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) call Occur as part of 4 inherited disorders, including Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL), neurofibromatosis 1 (NF-1) (von Recklinghausen disease), and the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The relative frequency with which patients who have these disorders develop PETs is MEN1 > VHL > NF-1 > TSC. Over the last few years, there have been major advances in the understanding of the genetics and molecular pathogenesis of these disorders as well in the localization and the medical and Surgical treatment of PETs in Such patients. The study of PETs in these disorders not only has provided insights into the possible pathogenesis of sporadic PETs but also has presented several unique management and treatment issues, some of which are applicable to patients with sporadic PETs. Therefore, the study of PETs in these Uncommon disorders has provided valuable insights that, in many cases, are applicable to the general group of patients with sporadic PETs. In this article, these areas are reviewed briefly along with the current state of knowledge of the PETs in these disorders, and the controversies that exist in their management are summarized briefly and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据