4.5 Article

Residual force enhancement after lengthening is present during submaximal plantar flexion and dorsiflexion actions in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 18-25

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00565.2006

关键词

eccentric; cross bridge; skeletal muscle; passive force enhancement; triceps surae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stretch of an activated muscle causes a transient increase in force during the stretch and a sustained, residual force enhancement ( RFE) after the stretch. The purpose of this study was to determine whether RFE is present in human muscles under physiologically relevant conditions ( i. e., when stretches were applied within the working range of large postural leg muscles and under submaximal voluntary activation). Submaximal voluntary plantar flexion ( PFv) and dorsiflexion ( DFv) activation was maintained by providing direct visual feedback of the EMG from soleus or tibialis anterior, respectively. RFE was also examined during electrical stimulation of the plantar flexion muscles ( PFs). Constant- velocity stretches ( 15 / s) were applied through a range of motion of 15 using a custom- built ankle torque motor. The muscles remained active throughout the stretch and for at least 10 s after the stretch. In all three activation conditions, the stable joint torque measured 9 - 10 s after the stretch was greater than the isometric joint torque at the final joint angle. When expressed as a percentage of the isometric torque, RFE values were 7, 13, and 12% for PFv, PFs, DFv, respectively. These findings indicate that RFE is a characteristic of human skeletal muscle and can be observed during submaximal ( 25%) voluntary activation when stretches are applied on the ascending limb of the force- length curve. Although the underlying mechanisms are unclear, it appears that sarcomere popping and passive force enhancement are insufficient to explain the presence of RFE in these experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据