4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Synthesis of polycrystalline platelike KNbO3 particles by the topochemical micro-crystal conversion method and fabrication of grain-oriented (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 27, 期 13-15, 页码 4085-4092

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.02.099

关键词

platelike KNbO3 particle; niobates perovskites; piezoelectric properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycrystalline rectangular-platelike KNbO3 particles with an orthorhombic perovskite structure were synthesized by the topochemical microcrystal conversion (TMC) method from rectangular-platelike precursor particles of layer-structured K4Nb6O17 at 850 degrees C in molten KCl-salt. TMC-synthesized KNbO3 particles preserved the shape of precursor particles, and had a thickness of about I pm, a width of 5-10 mu m and a length of 20-40 mu m. However. TMC-synthesized rectangular-platelike KNbO3 particles exhibited a polycrystalline morphology having preferred pseudo-cubic {0 0 1} orientation. Oriented particulate layer (OPL) X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that, in the TMC reaction, the crystallographic {010} plane of K4Nb6O17, which is the largest extensive face, is converted into the {0 01} plane of polycrystalline KNbO3 particles, which is the largest developed face, in spite of polycrystalline morphology. Using the polycrystalline rectangular-platelike KNbO3 particles as template in the reactive templated grain growth method, gram-oriented (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3-1 m01% CuO ceramics having a pseudo-cubic {0 01} orientation degree (Logering's factor) of 39.7% could be fabricated. The result indicates that not only single crystalline particles, which were generally used, but also the polycrystalline particles can be act as template in the templated grain growth process. The availability of polycrystalline particles will give a new synthesis design of templates for texturing of various kinds of ceramics. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据