4.5 Article

E2f1, E2f2, and E2f3 control E2F target expression and cellular proliferation via a p53-dependent negative feedback loop

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 65-78

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.02147-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD047470] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K01CA104079, K01CA102328, R01CA082259, P01CA097189, R01CA085619] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA082259, K01 CA104079, R01 CA085619, R01 CA 82259, K01 CA102328, K01 CA 104079, R01 CA 85619, P01 CA 097189, K01 CA 102328] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD 047470, R01 HD047470] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

E2F-mediated control of gene expression is believed to have an essential role in the control of cellular proliferation. Using a conditional gene-targeting approach, we show that the targeted disruption of the entire E2F activator subclass composed of E2f1, E2f2, and E2f3 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts leads to the activation of p53 and the induction of p53 target genes, including p21(CIP1). Consequently, cyclin-dependent kinase activity and retinoblastoma (Rb) phosphoryllation are dramatically inhibited, leading to Rb/E2F-mediated repression of E2F target gene expression and a severe block in cellular proliferation. Inactivation of p53 in E2f1-, E2f2-, and E2j3-deficient cells, either by spontaneous mutation or by conditional gene ablation, prevented the induction of p21(CIP1) and many other p53 target genes. As a result, cyclin-dependent kinase activity, Rb phosphorylation, and E2F target gene expression were restored to nearly normal levels, rendering cells responsive to normal growth signals. These findings suggest that a critical function of the E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 activators is in the control of a p53-dependent axis that indirectly regulates E2F-mediated transcriptional repression and cellular proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据