4.6 Article

Maternal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth

期刊

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 144-151

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000248536.94919.e3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: We sought to relate the risk of antepartum stillbirth to uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry at 22-24 weeks. METHODS: Data were available from 30,519 unselected women from seven units in the UK who had uterine artery Doppler performed between 22 and 24 weeks of gestation. The risk of stillbirth (n=109) was assessed using time to event and logistic regression analysis. Stillbirths were subdivided into placental (due to abruption, preeclampsia, or growth restriction) or unexplained. RESULTS: The risk of placental stillbirth was increased among women with a mean pulsatility index in the top decile (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.5, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 2.8-10.6) and those with a bilateral notch (adjusted HR 3.9, 95% Cl 2.0-7.8). The relationship between a mean pulsatility index in the top decile and the risk of unexplained stillbirth was weaker (adjusted HR 2.5, 95% Cl 1.1-5.6) and there was no association with a bilateral notch. Placental stillbirths occurred at earlier gestations than unexplained stillbirths (median [interquartile range] 30 [26-36] compared with 38 [36-40], P <.001). Consequently, being in the top 5% of predicted risk of stillbirth on the basis of the combination of mean pulsatility index and notching was a good predictor (sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio) of all cause stillbirth up to 32 weeks (58%, 95%, and 12.1, respectively) but a poor predictor of stillbirth at later gestations (7%, 95%, and 1.3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Abnormal uterine artery Doppler was a better predictor of the risk of stillbirth due to placental causes than unexplained stillbirth. Consequently, abnormal uterine artery Doppler was a good predictor of stillbirth at extreme preterm gestations but a poor predictor of stillbirth at term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据