4.6 Article

Diboryl and diboranyl porphyrin complexes: Synthesis, structural motifs and redox chemistry: Diborenyl porphyrin or diboranyl isophlorin?

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 5982-5993

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200700046

关键词

boron; density functional calculations; isophlorin; porphyrinoids; redox chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The syntheses of diboryl porphyrin complexes [(BX2)(2)(ttp)] (ttp: dianion of tetra-p-tolylporphyrin) and the B-B single-bond diboranyl complexes [(BX)(2)(ttp)] (X=F, Cl, Br, I) are given. The former are prepared from the reactions of BX3 (X=F, Cl) with [Li-2(ttp)] and the latter from B2Cl4 (X=Cl), the reaction of SbF3 with [(BCl)(2)(ttp)] (for X=F), and, in the cases of X=Br or I, in a remarkable reductive coupling reaction resulting directly from the reaction of BBr3 or BI3 with [Li-2(ttp)]. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the thermochernical parameters for the reductive coupling reactions (and those calculated for related dipyrromethene complexes) indicate that a combination of the reducing ability of bromide and iodide ions combined with the constrained environment of the porphyrin ligand contribute to the driving force. The reductive coupling is also observed in the reaction of [(BCl2)(2)(ttp)] with nBuLi to give [(BnBU)(2)(ttp)], which was characterised crystallographically. The reaction of [(BCl)(2)(ttp)] with catechol gives a boron catecholato porphyrin complex, [B-2(O2C6H4)(ttp)] Chloride abstraction from [(BCl)(2)(ttp)] gives the planar dication [B-2(ttp)](2+), whereas chemical reduction of [(BCl)(2)-(ttp)] by using magnesium anthracenide gives a neutral complex, [B-2(ttp)], in which the ttp ligand has been reduced by two electrons to give an unusual example of an isophlorin complex. The cationic and neutral complexes [B-2(ttp)](2+) and [B-2(ttp)] were characterised through a combination of spectroscopic data that is supported by DFT calculations on the porphine analogues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据