4.5 Article

Myostatin gene deletion prevents glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 148, 期 1, 页码 452-460

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2006-0539

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoids mediate muscle atrophy in many catabolic states. Myostatin expression, a negative regulator of muscle growth, is increased by glucocorticoids and myostatin overexpression is associated with lower muscle mass. This suggests that myostatin is required for the catabolic effects of glucocorticoids. We therefore investigated whether myostatin gene disruption could prevent muscle atrophy caused by glucocorticoids. Male myostatin knockout (KO) and wild-type mice were subjected to dexamethasone treatment (1 mg/kg.d for 10 d or 5 mg/kg.d for 4 d). In wild-type mice, daily administration of low-dose dexamethasone for 10 d resulted in muscle atrophy (tibialis anterior: -15%; gastrocnemius: -13%; P < 0.01) due to 15% decrease in the muscle fiber cross-sectional area (1621 +/- 31 vs. 1918 +/- 64 mu m(2), P < 0.01). In KO mice, there was no reduction of muscle mass nor fiber cross-sectional area after dexamethasone treatment. Muscle atrophy after 4d of high-dose dexamethasone was associated with increased mRNA of enzymes involved in proteolytic pathways (atrogin-1, muscle ring finger 1, and cathepsin L) and increased chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity. In contrast, the mRNA of these enzymes and the proteasomal activity were not significantly affected by dexamethasone in KO mice. Muscle IGF-I mRNA was paradoxically decreased in KO mice (-35%, P < 0.05); this was associated with a potentially compensatory increase of IGF-II expression in both saline and dexamethasone-treated KO mice (2-fold, P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results show that myostatin deletion prevents muscle atrophy in glucocorticoid-treated mice, by blunting the glucocorticoid-induced enhanced proteolysis, and suggest an important role of myostatin in muscle atrophy caused by glucocorticoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据