4.5 Article

The pattern of melatonin receptor expression in the brain may influence antidepressant treatment

期刊

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 120-124

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH61572, R01 MH061572, R01 MH061572-05] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH061572] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pineal hormone melatonin produces most of its biological effects via G protein-coupled receptors MT1 and MT2. In mammals, these receptors are expressed in various tissues and organs including in the brain. Recent research points to a putative role of MT1/MT2 dimerization as a mechanism that could determine the receptor-mediated biological effects of melatonin. Brain content and the ratios between MT1 and MT2 receptors are affected by illness, e.g., Alzheimer's disease, and by prolonged drug treatment, e.g., antidepressants. New drugs with antidepressant properties that bind and activate melatonin receptors have been discovered. We hypothesize that endogenous, i.e., low, levels of melatonin could contribute to antidepressant effects depending on the expression pattern of melatonin receptors in the brain. Hence, we propose that a prolonged treatment with classical antidepressant drugs alters the brain ratio of MT1/MT2 receptors to enable the endogenous melatonin, which is secreted during the night, to further improve the antidepressant effects. A corollary of this hypothesis is that antidepressants would be less effective in conditions of pathologically altered brain melatonin receptors, e.g., in Alzheimer's patients or due to genetic polymorphisms. If our hypothesis is confirmed, supplementing classical antidepressant treatment with an appropriate dose of a melatonin receptor agonist might be used to improve antidepressant effects in subjects with a susceptible pattern of brain melatonin receptor expression. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据