4.5 Review

The pain of fibromyalgia syndrome is due to muscle hypoperfusion induced by regional vasomotor dysregulation

期刊

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 517-525

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.10.037

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R21AT000942, F32AT002667] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCCIH NIH HHS [R21 AT000942, F32 AT002667, 1 F32AT002667-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [U48-CCU115802] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a condition of chronic muscle pain and fatigue of unknown etiology and pathogenesis. There is limited support for the various hypotheses espoused to account for the manifestations of FMS, including immunogenic, endocrine, and neurological mechanisms. Treatment, partially effective at best, is directed toward symptomatic relief without the benefit of targeting known, underlying pathology. A noteworthy commonality among partially effective therapies is a vasodilatory effect. This is true both of conventional treatments, unconventional treatments such as intravenous micronutrient therapy, and lifestyle treatments, specifically graduated exercise. The pain of fibromyalgia is described in terms suggestive of the pain in muscles following extreme exertion and anaerobic metabolism. Taken together, these characteristics suggest that the pain could be induced by vasomotor dysregulation, and vasoconstriction in muscle, leading to low-level ischemia and its metabolic sequelae. Vasodilatory influences, including physical activity, relieve the pain of FMS by increasing muscle perfusion. There are some preliminary data consistent with this hypothesis, and nothing known about FMS that refutes it. The hypothesis that the downstream cause of FMS symptoms is muscle hypoperfusion due to regional vasomotor dysregulation has clear implications for treatment; is testable with current technology; and should be investigated. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据