4.2 Article

Insecticides and a fungicide affect multiple coral life stages

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 127-137

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps330127

关键词

coral; reef; pollution; insecticide; fungicide; fertilisation; metamorphosis; pesticide; settlement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coral reefs are under threat from land-based agricultural pollutants on a global scale. The vulnerability of early life stages of corals is of particular concern. Here, we compared the sensitivity of gametes, larvae and adult branches of the broadcast-spawning coral Acropora millepora (Ehrenberg) to a number of common pollutants, including 4 classes of insecticides-2 organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, profenofos), an organochlorine (endosulfan), a carbamate (carbaryl) and a pyrethroid (permethrin)-and a fungicide (2-methoxyethylmercuric chloride, MEMC). Fertilisation of gametes was not affected by any of the insecticides at concentrations up to 30 mu g 1(-1). In contrast, settlement and metamorphosis were reduced by between 50 and 100% following 18 h exposure to very low concentrations (0.3 to 1.0 mu g 1-1) of each insecticide class. The insecticides had few visible effects on adult branches following 96 h exposure to a concentration of 10 mu g 1-1, with the exception of profenofos, which caused polyp retraction, bleaching (i.e. algal symbiont densities were reduced) and a slight reduction in photosynthetic efficiency of the algal symbionts. The fungicide MEMC affected all life-history stages: both fertilisation and metamorphosis were inhibited at 1.0 mu g 1(-1), and polyps became withdrawn and photosynthetic efficiency was slightly reduced at 1.0 mu g 1(-1). At 10 mu g 1(-1) MEMC, branches bleached and some host tissue died. This high susceptibility of coral larvae to pesticides at concentrations around their detection limit highlights the critical need to assess toxicity against all life-history stages of keystone organisms: to focus on mature individuals may underestimate species sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据