4.7 Article

The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) - An international internet-based survey of 1179 MPD patients

期刊

CANCER
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 68-76

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22365

关键词

myeloproliferative disorders; fatigue; quality of life; constitutional symptoms; polycythemia vera; myelofibrosis

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K23 CA96780] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA096780] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Few objective data exist on the burden of fatigue and other constitutional symptoms in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). METHODS. The authors used validated instruments of fatigue and physical activity assessment during an Internet-based symptom survey of 1179 MPD patients (median age, 56 years; 41.4% men). RESULTS. The frequency of self-reporting was 80.7% for fatigue, which was substantially higher than that of pruritus (52.2%), night sweats (49.2%), bone pain (43.9%), fever (13.7%), and weight loss (13.1%). In the majority of patients, these symptoms restricted participation in both social functions and physical activity. In addition, 34.5% of patients needed assistance with activities of daily living, and 11.2% reported MPD-associated medical disability. As expected, the presence of myelofibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly, or other features associated with advanced disease favored a higher degree of fatigue. However, fatigue remained the major complaint also in polycythemia vera (84.9%) and essential thrombocythemia (72.4%); these figures were significantly higher than those of published controls (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS. The current study identifies fatigue as the major contributor to poor quality of life in MPD, provides baseline information on constitutional symptoms, and underscores the need for the incorporation of quality of life assessment in clinical trials. Cancer 2007;109:68-76. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据