4.3 Article

Endosomal release and intracellular delivery of anticancer drugs using pH-sensitive PEGylated nanogels

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 35, 页码 3720-3725

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b706973a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pH-sensitive PEGylated nanogel was prepared by emulsion copolymerization of 2-(N,N-diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (EAMA) with heterobifunctional poly( ethylene glycol) bearing a 4-vinylbenzyl group at the alpha-end and a carboxylic acid group at the omega-end (CH2 = CH - Ph - PEG -COOH; M-n = 8000) in the presence of potassium persulfate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (1.0 mol%) as cross-linker. The loading of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) into the pH-sensitive PEGylated nanogel was carried out by means of a solvent evaporation method, and the amount of DOX loaded into the PEAMA core was found to be 26 wt%. Furthermore, the DOX-loaded, pH-sensitive PEGylated nanogel showed almost no initial burst release of the DOX under physiological pH, whereas significant release of DOX from the pH-sensitive PEGylated nanogel was observed at the endosomal pH. The antitumor activity of the DOX-loaded, pH-sensitive, PEGylated nanogel against the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was lower than that of free DOX. On the other hand, the antitumor activity of the DOX-loaded, pH-sensitive, PEGylated nanogel against the human hepatoma cell line HuH-7, which is a natural drug-resistant tumor line, was superior to that of both free DOX and the DOX-loaded, pH- insensitive, PEGylated nanogel. Using fluorescence microscopy, pH- sensitive PEGylated nanogel in HuH-7 cells was found to be initially localized within the endosome and/or lysosome, with subsequent release of DOX from the nanogel in response to the endosomal pH, and ultimately, diffusion via the cytoplasm into the cell nucleus. These findings suggest that the pH- sensitive PEGylated nanogel represents a promising nano-sized carrier for anticancer drug delivery systems in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据