4.4 Article

Testicular volume measurements using Prader orchidometer versus ultrasonography in patients with infertility

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 158-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To compare the accuracy of testicular volume measurements with the Prader orchidometer versus ultrasonography. METHODS The volume of 938 testes in 469 men with infertility (mean age 35.8 years) was measured using a Prader orchidometer and by uttrasonography. The ultrasound testicular volumes were calculated using the formula length X width X height X 0.71. To compare any differences between the methods according to testicular size, the patients were divided into six groups according to the ultrasound-determined volume: less than 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, 15 to 20, 20 to 25, and 25 cm(3) or more. RESULTS The mean volume by orchidometry and ultrasonography was 18.7 and 13.7 cm(3) for the right testis and 18.0 and 12.5 cm(3) for the left, respectively, and was significantly overestimated by orchidometry (P < 0.0001; by 5.1 cm(3) on the right and 5.5 cm(3) on the left). The largest differences between methods were observed for volumes of 10 to 15 cm(3) on the right and 5 to 10 cm(3) on the left. The difference between the methods decreased as the ultrasound-determined volume increased (r = 0.636 on the right; r = 0.598 on the left testis). Nonetheless, the Prader orchidometric measurements showed a strong correlation with the ultrasound measurements (r = 0.707 on the right; r = 0.746 on the left). CONCLUSIONS The testicular volume estimated by Prader orchidometry correlated closely with the measurements by ultrasonography. However, the orchidometer overestimated the testicular volume, especially in small testes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据