4.5 Article

Binaral interaction and centrifugal input enhances spatial contrast in olfactory bulb activation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 576-586

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05279.x

关键词

odors; olfactory bulb; optical recording; terrapene carolensis; voltage-sensitive dyes

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32-DC-00011] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32-GM007863] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007863] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [T32DC000011] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used paired-pulse odorant stimulation, with a conditioning stimulus delivered either ipsilateral or contralateral to a test stimulus, to unmask the effects of centrifugal feedback on olfactory bulb responses. In reptiles and mammals there are no direct connections between the paired olfactory bulbs, and thus all information transfer between the olfactory bulbs depends on feedback from retrobulbar structures. We measured odor-induced activity in the turtle olfactory bulb using a voltage-sensitive dye and a 464-element photodiode array, which allowed us to monitor the spatial variation in activation of the olfactory bulb. We found that both contralateral and ipsilateral conditioning stimuli evoked long-lasting inhibition of olfactory bulb activation. In contrast to previous studies using local field potential recording to monitor activity at a single site, we found that this inhibition increased contrast in the spatial patterning of activation over the dorsal surface of the olfactory bulb. Inhibition was also increased when different odorants were used as conditioning and test stimuli, suggesting a role for centrifugal feedback in olfactory discrimination. These results highlight the functional importance of centrifugal feedback and information processing in a broadly distributed olfactory network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据