4.5 Article

Lack of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor leads to impaired activation of AKT/protein kinase B and enhanced sensitivity to apoptosis induced via the intrinsic pathway

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.111773

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES008088, R01 ES011295, ES 008088, ES 11295] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R29ES008088, R01ES008088, R01ES011295] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor ( AHR) is a ligand activated transcription factor that is best known for its role in mediating the toxicity of many environmental contaminants such as 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. However, the endogenous role of AHR, especially with respect to the apoptotic process, is largely unknown and contradictory. In this report, we have used a mouse hepatoma cell line (Hepa1c1c7) and its AHR- deficient derivative ( LA1) to examine the effect of differing AHR levels on apoptosis susceptibility, in particular, apoptosis regulated by the intrinsic pathway. Toward this end, the cells were subjected to UV irradiation, hydrogen peroxide, and serum starvation. Analyses of a number of different endpoints of apoptosis revealed that the LA1 cells were more sensitive to these stresses than the wild- type cells, indicating that the AHR plays a cytoprotective role in the face of stimuli that initiate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. A direct role of the AHR in mediating this effect was confirmed using both pharmacological and molecular approaches. Further analyses imply that lack of the AHR leads to an impaired survival response mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3'-OH kinase- Akt/ protein kinase B and, to a lesser degree, epidermal growth factor receptor activation. These findings indicate that exploring the use of the AHR antagonist as agents that enhance the proapoptotic actions of cancer therapies may be a valid approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据