4.5 Article

Improved angiogenic response in pig heart following ischaemic injury using human skeletal myoblast simultaneously expressing VEGF(165) and anglopoietin-1

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 15-22

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.04.008

关键词

angiogenesis; gene therapy; infarction; skeletal myoblast

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To achieve angiogenic interaction between VEGF(165) and angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) using a novel adenoviral bicistronic vector (Ad-Bic) encoding the two factors and delivered ex vivo using sex-mismatched human skeletal myoblasts. Methods and results: A myocardial infarction model was developed in 29 female pigs; randomised into four groups: DMEM (group-1, n=6); Adenovirus null (Ad-null) vector-myoblast (group-2, n=5); Ad-Ang-1 myoblast (group 3, n=7) and Ad-Bic-myoblast (group-4, n = 11). Three weeks later, 5 ml DMEM without myoblasts or containing 3 x 108 myoblasts carrying lac-z gene and transduced with Ad-null, Ad-Ang-1 or Ad-Bic were injected intra-myocardially in and around the infaret. 2D-echocardiography and fluorescent microsphere studies 6-and 12-weeks post-treatment revealed significantly improved cardiac performance and regional blood flow in groups 3 and 4. Histological studies and Y-chromosome analysis revealed extensive survival of lac-z positive myoblasts staining positive for human proteins in the pig heart. ELISA, inummostaining and RT-PCR revealed that Ad-Bic transduced myoblasts concomitantly but transiently expressed hVEGF(165) and Ang-1 both in vitro and in vivo. Double fluorescent immunostaining of the tissue sections for vWFactor-III and smooth muscle actin showed significantly higher vascular density of mature blood vessels per low power microscopic field in groups 3 and 4 at 6- and 12-weeks. Conclusion: Our combined approach led to enhanced angiogenesis with a greater percentage of functionally mature blood vessels in a porcine heart. (c) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据