4.5 Article

Comparative study between coral-mesenchymal stem cells-rhBMP-2 composite and auto-bone-graft in rabbit critical-sized cranial defect model

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30840

关键词

bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells; rhBMP-2; coral; critical-sized cranial defect; bone regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineered bone has become a bone substitute for the treatment of bone defects in animal research. This study investigated the osteogenesis capacity of coral-MSCs-rhBMP-2 composite with the auto-bone-graft as control. Coral-MSCs-rhBMP-2 composite were fabricated by coral (as main scaffold), rhBMP-2 (as growth factor), and MSCs (cultured from iliac marrow as seed cells). Critical-sized defects (d = 15 mm) were made on forty rabbits crania and treated by different composite scaffolds: iliac autograft (n = 8), coral (n = 8), rhBMP-2/coral (n = 8), and MSCs/rhBMP-2/coral (n = 8). The defects were evaluated by gross observation, radiographic examination, histological examination, and histological fluorescence examinations after 8 and 16 weeks. The results showed that repair of bone defect was the least in coral group, and significant ingrowth of new bone formation and incorporation could be seen with 77.45% 0.52% in radiopacity in MSCs/rhBMP-2/coral group, which was similar to that in iliac autograft group (84.61% +/- 0.56% in radiopacity). New bone formation in MSCs/rhBMP-2/coral group was more than that in rhBMP-2/coral group. And osteogenesis rate in MSCs/rhBMP-2/coral group (10.23 +/- 1.45 mu m) was much faster than that in rhBMP-2/coral group (5.85 +/- 2.19 mu m) according to histological fluorescence examination. Newly formed bone partly came from induced MSCs in composite scaffold according to bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemical examination. These data implicated that MSCs could produce synergic effect with coral-rhBMP-2, and the tissue engineered bone of coral-MSCs-rhBMP-2 is comparable to auto-bone-graft for the repair of critical-sized bone defect. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据