4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Formation of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds loaded with small molecules by integrated processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 S80-S88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.022

关键词

scaffold; poly(epsilon-caprolactone); freeze drying; pressure quench foaming; drug loading; small molecule

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell stimulation by bioactive molecules has become an important tool in tissue engineering. The homogeneous incorporation of such molecules within the bulk of a polymer-based scaffold compared to surface coating is considered advantageous for most applications and minimizes a burst effect. An efficient way of bulk loading is the incorporation of these molecules during the scaffold formation process. In this paper, two different integrated processes for the preparation of scaffolds from poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) loaded with a small molecule are investigated. Both formation and loading of the scaffold is carried out in a single-step process. Sudan Red G was selected as a model compound for lipophilic small molecules. A freeze drying and pressure quench (PQ) formation process was selected, and the influence of the small molecule on the formation processes and on the morphology of the obtained scaffold was evaluated and compared. It could be shown for both processes that the formation of loaded scaffolds is possible, and that the small molecule has a very high impact on the foam morphology. In case of the freeze-drying (FD) method, only a load of 1 wt% Sudan Red G was incorporated within the bulk and showed no influence on the foam morphology. In the case of PQ foaming, an incorporation of 43 wt% Sudan Red G was achieved (although tiny crystal needles of the small molecule were found on the surface) and a strong effect on the foam morphology was found. This paper presents an efficient method of incorporating small molecules by integrated processes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据