4.5 Article

The effect of torque direction and cylindrical handle diameter on the coupling between the hand and a cylindrical handle

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 40, 期 14, 页码 3236-3243

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.04.023

关键词

hand torque strength; torque direction; hand biomechanics; hand ergonomics; grip force distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pheasant and O'Neill's torque model (1975) was modified to account for grip force distributions. The modified model suggests that skin friction produced by twisting an object in the direction of fingertips causes flexion of the distal phalanges and increases grip force and, thus, torque. Twelve subjects grasped a cylindrical object with diameters of 45.1, 57.8, and 83.2 mm in a power grip, and performed maximum torque exertions about the long axis of the handle in two directions: the direction the thumb points and the direction the fingertips point. Normal force on the fingertips increased with torque toward the fingertips, as predicted by the model. Consequently, torque toward the fingertips was 22% greater than torque toward the thumb. Measured torque and fingertip forces were compared with model predictions. Torque could be predicted well by the model. Measured fingertip force and thumb force were, on average, 27% less than the predicted values. Consistent with previous studies, grip force decreased as the handle diameter increased from 45.1 to 83.2 mm. This may be due not only to the muscle length-strength relationship, but also to major active force locations on the hand: grip force distributions suggest that a small handle allows fingertip force and thumb force to work together against the palm, resulting in a high reaction force on the palm, and, therefore, a high grip force. For a large handle, fingertip force and thumb force act against each other, resulting in little reaction force on the palm and, thus, a low grip force. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据