4.6 Review

A systematic review of the effects of acute psychological stress and physical activity on haemorheology, coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet reactivity: Implications for the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 120, 期 6, 页码 819-847

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.01.004

关键词

triggering; physical activity; exercise; mental/psychological stress; haemostasis; haemorheology; coagulation; fibrinolysis; platelets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physical activity and psychological stress are two potential triggers for the onset of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). To examine the mechanisms underlying this association, we systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effects of acute psychological stress and physical activity on haemorheology and haemostasis. Studies examining the haemorheological and haemostatic response to an acute bout of physical activity (i.e. <60 min) or laboratory psychological stress task were eligible for inclusion. The experimental evidence, although compromised by various methodological weaknesses, suggests that low and moderate intensity physical activity may be cardio-protective through beneficial effects on fibrinolytic system. High Levels of physical activity, and psychological to a lesser extent, have been consistently associated with robust changes in haemorheology and haemostasis. Such findings imply that such activities may have the potential to trigger the onset of ACS, although in reality this may be limited sedentary individual and/or those with pre-existing vascular disease. In addition, the data also suggest that individuals may be at a greatest risk of stress-induced thrombogenesis in the period immediately following physical activity or psychological stress, rather than during the activity per se. In conclusion, psychological stress and physical activity may act as potential triggers for the onset of ACS via effects on haemostasis and haemorheology. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据