4.6 Article

Developmental competence and expression of the Hsp 70.1 gene in oocytes obtained from Bos indicus and Bos taurus dairy cows in a tropical environment

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 626-632

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.03.029

关键词

heat stress; oocyte; in vitro fertilization; heat shock protein; Bos indicus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bos indicus cows usually have better reproductive performance in tropical and subtropical regions than Bos taurus cows, presumably due to their better adaptation to tropical environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the developmental competence and expression of the Hsp 70.1 gene in immature oocytes from B. taurus (Holstein) and B. indicus (Gyr) dairy cows raised in a tropical region. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were obtained by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration between spring and early autumn, and subjected to in vitro maturation and fertilization. Presumptive zygotes were co-cultured with their own cumulus cells in CR2aa media with 10% fetal calf serum; Grade 1 blastocysts were transferred to synchronized crossbred recipients. The total RNA was extracted from immature Holstein and Gyr oocytes (three pools for each breed) and relative quantification of the Hsp 70.1 transcripts was performed by real time PCR after reverse transcription. Cleavage and blastocyst rates were greater (P < 0.05) for Gyr (n = 390 oocytes) than Holstein (n = 505) breed (66.7% versus 53.1% of cleavage and 19.6% versus 10.8% of blastocysts, respectively), but pregnancy rates were not significantly different following transfer to recipients (44.5% for 36 Gyr embryos; 60% for 10 Holstein embryos). Holstein immature oocytes had a higher level (P < 0.05) of Hsp 70.1 relative expression (1.82 +/- 0.22; mean S.E.M.) than Gyr oocytes (1.12 +/- 0.11). In conclusion, Gyr oocytes obtained in a tropical region were less subject to stress and more likely to develop (after IVF) than Holstein oocytes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据