4.5 Article

The impact of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia on health-related quality of life: a prospective study

期刊

CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
卷 182, 期 16, 页码 1731-1736

出版社

CMA-CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091711

关键词

-

资金

  1. Merck
  2. Wyeth
  3. Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.
  4. Canada Research Chairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Vaccination against herpes zoster is being considered in many countries. We conducted a multi centre prospective study to describe the impact of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia on health-related quality of life. Methods: From October 2005 to July 2006, 261 outpatients aged 50 years or older with herpes zoster were recruited from the clinical practices of 83 physicians within 14 days after rash onset. The Zoster Brief Pain Inventory was used to measure severity of pain and interference with activities of daily living because of pain. The EuroQol EQ-5D assessment tool was used to measure quality of life. These outcomes were assessed at recruitment and on days 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 following recruitment. Results: Acute herpes zoster interfered in all health do mains, especially sleep (64% of participants), enjoyment of life (58%) and general activities (53%). The median duration of pain was 32.5 days. The median duration of in terference with activities of daily living because of pain varied between 27 and 30 days. Overall, 24% of the participants had postherpetic neuralgia (pain for more than 90 days after rash onset). Anxiety and depression, enjoyment of life, mood and sleep were most frequently affected during the postherpetic neuralgia period. The mean EQ-5D score was 0.59 at enrolment and remained at 0.67 at all follow-up points among participants who reported clinically significant pain. Interpretation: These data support the need for preventive strategies and additional early intervention to reduce the burden of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据