4.7 Article

MRI detection of macrophages labeled using micrometer-sized iron oxide particles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1210-1218

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20930

关键词

contrast agent; iron-oxide particles; MPIO; cellular MRI; macrophages; MPIO-labeled macrophages; rat model

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR015704] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [P41EB001977, R01EB000318] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [S10 RR 15704] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB 001977, R01 EB 00318] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate cellular labeling of immune cells using micron-sized iron oxide particles (MPIOs) and evaluate the MR relaxivity and MRI detection of the labeled cells. Materials and Methods: Immune cells isolated from mice and rats were labeled with three different sizes of MPIO particles (0.35, 0.90, or 1.63 mu m). These labeled cells were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, MR relaxometry, and MRI. Results: Macrophage uptake of MPIOs was found to be highest for the 1.63-mu m size particles. MR relaxivity measurements indicated greater spin-spin relaxation for MPIO-labeled cells relative to cells labeled with nanometer-sized ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles with similar iron content. TEM and fluorescence microscopy indicated cellular uptake of multiple MPIO particles per cell. Macrophages labeled with 1.63-mu m MPIOs had an average cellular iron uptake of 39.1 pg/cell, corresponding to approximately 35 particles per cell. Conclusion: Cells labeled with one or more MPIO particles could be readily detected ex vivo at 11.7 Tesla and after infusion of the MPIO-labeled macrophages into the kidney of a rat, hypointense regions of the outer cortex are observed, in vivo, by MRI at 4.7 Tesla.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据