4.6 Article

Glucagon-like peptide-1 excites pancreas-projecting preganglionic vagal motoneurons

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00562.2006

关键词

brain stem; electrophysiology; vagus; pancreas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) increases pancreatic insulin secretion via a direct action on pancreatic beta-cells. A high density of GLP-1-containing neurons and receptors is also present in brain stem vagal circuits; therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate 1) whether identified pancreas-projecting neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV) respond to exogenously applied GLP-1, 2) the mechanism(s) of action of GLP-1, and 3) whether the GLP-1-responsive neurons ( putative modulators of endocrine secretion) could be distinguished from DMV neurons responsive to peptides that modulate pancreatic exocrine secretion, specifically pancreatic polypeptide ( PP). Whole cell recordings were made from identified pancreas-projecting DMV neurons. Perfusion with GLP- 1 induced a concentration- dependent depolarization in similar to 50% of pancreas-projecting DMV neurons. The GLP-1 effects were mimicked by exendin-4 and antagonized by exendin-(9-39). In similar to 60% of the responsive neurons, the GLP-1-induced depolarization was reduced by tetrodotoxin (1 mu M), suggesting both pre- and postsynaptic sites of action. Indeed, the GLP-1 effects were mediated by actions on potassium currents, GABA-induced currents, or both. Importantly, neurons excited by GLP-1 were unresponsive to PP and vice versa. These data indicate that 1) GLP-1 may act on DMV neurons to control pancreatic endocrine secretion, 2) the effects of GLP-1 on pancreas-projecting DMV neurons are mediated both via a direct excitation of their membrane as well as via an effect on local circuits, and 3) the GLP-1-responsive neurons (i.e., putative endocrine secretion-controlling neurons) could be distinguished from neurons responsive PP (i.e., putative exocrine secretion-controlling neurons).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据