4.2 Article

Role of the alternative sigma factors sigma(E) and sigma(S) in survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium during starvation, refrigeration and osmotic shock

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 263-269

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.29235-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to survive environmental stress requires specific, coordinated, responses, which induce resistance to the stress condition. This study investigated the relative contribution of a and c, the sigma factors regulating extracytoplasmic and general stress response functions, respectively, to survival at low temperature and also in media of differing osmotic strength, conditions relevant to food preservation. To determine if low-temperature storage is a signal for sigma(E)- and sigma(S)-mediated survival, the ability of S. Typhimurium rpoE, rpoS and rpoE/rpoS mutants to survive in a saline starvation-survival model at a refrigeration temperature (4.5 degrees C) was examined. Under these conditions, the rpoE mutant was significantly (P < 0.05) compromised compared to the parent and to an rpoS mutant. The double mutant in rpoE and rpoS displayed a cumulative defect in survival. In hyperosmotic environments (low a(w)) containing 6% NaCl and at refrigeration temperature, both sigma factors were important for maximum survival but as played the dominant role. Analysis of the metabolic activity of starved populations at 4.5 and 37 degrees C revealed significantly (P < 0.001) elevated electron-transport system activity in mutants in rpoE and rpoS, indicating a role for sigma(E)- and sigma(S)-regulated genes in maintaining energy homeostasis. Together these data demonstrate that a E and as are important for survival of S. Typhimurium in conditions encountered during food processing and that the relative contribution of sigma(E) and sigma(S) is critically dependent on the precise nature of the stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据