期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 144-152出版社
AMER SOC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
DOI: 10.1309/5KF89P63F4F6EUHB
关键词
pathology; surgical pathology; anatomic; quality; errors; blinded review
类别
This review summarizes our experience using blinded review as a method to measure quality in surgical pathology. It details the specifics about how the review is performed, the weaknesses in the method, and then summarizes our results so far These results suggest that error rates correlate with the individual pathologist, the type of specimen, the type of diagnosis, subspecialization, and the number of pathologists who review a case. Errors do not correlate with workload. This method is relatively unbiased and effective at identifying significant errors in real-life clinical practice. The drawback to this method is the amount of work involved. Blinded review, performed so that errors can be corrected in a timely manner; and eventually integrated into an interlaboratory review process, represents a realistic and fair method to provide quantitative quality assurance information.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据