4.7 Article

The glycine decarboxylase complex multienzyme family in Populus

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 58, 期 7, 页码 1761-1770

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm034

关键词

one-carbon metabolism; lignin; photorespi ration; Populus genome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In plants, the glycine decarboxylase complex (GDC) cooperates with serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) to mediate photorespiratory glycine-serine interconversion. GDC is also postulated to be an integral component of one-carbon (C1) metabolism in heterotrophic tissues, although molecular evidence in plants is scarce. An initial report of a xylem-specific isoform of GDC component H-protein, PtgdcH1, in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) provided molecular evidence consistent with an important role for GDC in plant C1 metabolism. PtgdcH1 is phylogenetically distinct from the leaf-abundant photorespiratory PtgdcH3, but both isoforms restored GDC activity in a yeast H-protein knockout mutant, suggesting their functional equivalence. The Populus genome contains eight transcriptionally active GDC genes, encoding four H-proteins, two T-proteins, and single P- and L-proteins. The two Populus T-protein isoforms, PtgdcT1 and PtgdcT2, exhibited differential expression in leaves and xylem, similar to PtgdcH3 and PtgdcH1. In silico identification of AC elements in the promoters of xylem-abundant PtgdcH1 and PtgdcT2, as well as many lignin biosynthetic genes of Populus is consistent with a prominent role for GDC in methyl-intensive lignification during wood formation. The AC element is absent from Arabidopsis GDC promoters, and GDC expression has not been linked to secondary growth in this herbaceous annual. Taken together, the results suggest that the association of distinct H-protein and T-protein isoforms with photorespiration and C1 metabolism is a distinguishing feature of Populus, and may signify molecular adaptation of GDC to cope with the C1 demands of lignification in woody perennials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据