4.6 Article

A derivation of roughness correlation length for parameterizing radar backscatter models

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 28, 期 18, 页码 3995-4012

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160601075533

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface roughness is a key parameter of radar backscatter models designed to retrieve surface soil moisture (theta(S)) information from radar images. This work offers a theory-based approach for estimating a key roughness parameter, termed the roughness correlation length (L-c). The Lc is the length in centimetres from a point on the ground to a short distance for which the heights of a rough surface are correlated with each other. The approach is based on the relation between L-c and h(RMS) as theorized by the Integral Equation Model (IEM). The hRMS is another roughness parameter, which is the root mean squared height variation of a rough surface. The relation is calibrated for a given site based on the radar backscatter of the site under dry soil conditions. When this relation is supplemented with the site specific measurements of hRMS, it is possible to produce estimates of L-c. The approach was validated with several radar images of the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed in southeast Arizona, USA. Results showed that the IEM performed well in reproducing satellite-based radar backscatter when this new derivation of L-c was used as input. This was a substantial improvement over the use of field measurements of L-c. This new approach also has advantages over empirical formulations for the estimation of Lc because it does not require field measurements of theta(S) for iterative calibration and it accounts for the very complex relation between L-c and hRMS found in heterogeneous landscapes. Finally, this new approach opens up the possibility of determining both roughness parameters without ancillary data based on the radar backscatter difference measured for two different incident angles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据