4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal probabilities of obtaining cloud-free Landsat images over the Brazilian tropical savanna

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 2739-2752

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600981517

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remotely sensed data are the best and perhaps the only possible way for monitoring large-scale, human-induced land occupation and biosphere-atmosphere processes in regions such as the Brazilian tropical savanna (Cerrado). Landsat imagery has been intensively employed for these studies because of their long-term data coverage (> 30 years), suitable spatial and temporal resolutions, and ability to discriminate different land-use and land-cover classes. However, cloud cover is the most obvious constraint for obtaining optical remote sensing data in tropical regions, and cloud cover analysis of remotely sensed data is a requisite step needed for any optical remote sensing studies. This study addresses the extent to which cloudiness can restrict the monitoring of the Brazilian Cerrado from Landsat-like sensors. Percent cloud cover from more than 35 500 Landsat quick-looks were estimated by the K-means unsupervised classification technique. The data were examined by month, season, and El Nino Southern Oscillation event. Monthly observations of any part of the biome are highly unlikely during the wet season (October-March), but very possible during the dry season, especially in July and August. Research involving seasonality is feasible in some parts of the Cerrado at the temporal satellite sampling frequency of Landsat sensors. There are several limitations at the northern limit of the Cerrado, especially in the transitional area with the Amazon. During the 1997 El Nino event, the cloudiness over the Cerrado decreased to a measurable but small degree (5% less, on average). These results set the framework and limitations of future studies of land use/ land cover and ecological dynamics using Landsat-like satellite sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据