4.5 Article

Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 487-496

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.015

关键词

Cebus apella; exchange behaviour; food preference; inequality; token exchange; tufted capuchin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the extent to which female capuchin monkeys show an ` aversion to inequitable work effort' by providing the monkeys with the opportunity to engage in token exchange tasks to earn either a preferred ( grape) or nonpreferred ( oat cereal) food item. In experiment 1, monkeys were paired with partners such that both were required to exchange a token ( work effort) for either a preferred or nonpreferred food reward. The subject's exchange behaviour was then compared to conditions in which the partner received the food reward for no work effort. We found no evidence that differential work effort influenced the percentage of incomplete exchanges. Furthermore, capuchins completed exchanges more rapidly for the preferred food item, regardless of the work effort of the partner. In experiment 2, we evaluated, in the absence of differential work effort, behavioural responses of monkeys to receipt of a preferred or nonpreferred food in conditions where their partner received either the same or different food. These conditions were compared to control conditions where either the same or different food was placed in an adjacent empty cage. Capuchins were less likely to accept nonpreferred food and consumed it more slowly than preferred food. We found no evidence that the presence of a partner influenced acceptance or consumption of the nonpreferred food under inequitable conditions. Overall, we found no indication that capuchins are able to evaluate either the relative work effort of a partner or the inequity of a food reward and are thus unlikely to possess an ` aversion to inequity'. (C) 2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据