4.7 Article

Development of a double acting free piston expander for power recovery in transcritical CO2 cycle

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 27, 期 8-9, 页码 1629-1636

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.05.034

关键词

expander; free piston; transcritical CO2-cycle; power recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To replace the throttling valve with an expander is considered as an efficient method to improve the performance of the transcritical CO, refrigeration cycle. This paper presents the design and experimental validation of a double acting free piston expander, in which a slider-based inlet/outlet control scheme is used to realize a full expansion process for the expander. The power extracted from the expansion process is utilized by an auxiliary compressor, which is arranged in parallel with the main compressor. A design model is developed to determine the geometric parameters of the expander together with the auxiliary compressor. An expander prototype is manufactured and validated experimentally in the air test system, mainly by means of analyzing the dynamic pressures in the expander chamber. The experimental results show that the expander can work stably in a wide range of pressure differences/ratios at the frequency approximately linear with the pressure difference through the expander. The p-t diagrams in the expander indicate that the slider-based inlet/outlet control scheme enables the expander to have the proper suction, expansion and discharge processes. However, the prototype at high frequency doesn't present isobaric suction process, which results in insufficient gas suction and therefore decrease in the expander efficiency. With the p-t diagrams at various frequencies compared, the optimal working frequency is found to range from 10 to 17 Hz in the air system. The isentropic efficiency of 62%, is obtained from the p-V diagram analysis. Further validation of the expander in the CO2 system will be conducted in the near future. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据